Evaluation of the Nutritional Content of Two Varieties of Fresh and Silage-Processed Pitahaya Stems as an Alternative Animal Feed

Main Article Content

Bruno Nahon Astudillo Cedeño
Alfredo Valverde Lucio

Abstract

The pitahaya (Selenicereus spp.) crop is notable for its adaptation to arid conditions and its productive potential. The objective of this study is to evaluate the nutritional content of pitahaya stems (Selenicereus undatus and Selenicereus costaricensis) in both fresh and silage forms. The study was conducted using a completely randomized design with a 2×2 factorial arrangement, considering variety and preservation state as factors, and analyzing bromatological variables such as moisture, dry matter, ash, fat, carbohydrates, fiber, organic matter, Brix degrees, and protein. The results showed that in the fresh state, S. costaricensis had higher moisture (93.7%) and protein (0.74) content, while S. undatus had higher values for dry matter (9.78%), carbohydrates (7.08%), and ash (0.34%). Regarding the ensiled state, both varieties showed an increase in nutrient concentration, with S. undatus standing out for its higher dry matter content (11.4%), carbohydrate content (8.29%), and Brix degrees (7.5°), indicating an improvement in the material’s energy value. analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences (p<0.0001) for variables such as moisture, dry matter, and Brix degrees, influenced by both the variety and the silage process. It was concluded that pitahaya stems have high moisture content and low protein levels; their use is intended as an energy supplement that is rich in fiber and low in protein.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Astudillo Cedeño, B. N., & Valverde Lucio, A. . (2026). Evaluation of the Nutritional Content of Two Varieties of Fresh and Silage-Processed Pitahaya Stems as an Alternative Animal Feed . Centrosur Agraria, 1(30), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.37959/revista.v1i30.320
Section
Articles

References

Castro, M., & Molina, P. (2021). Environmental perception and sustainability in higher education institutions. Latin American Journal of Environmental Education, 15(2), 45–60.

González, R., & Pérez, J. (2020). Environmental education as a strategy for university transformation. Scientific Journal of Sustainability, 8(1), 20-35.

Leff, E. (2019). Environmental Knowledge: Sustainability, Rationality, and Complexity. Siglo XXI Editores.

Martínez, L., & Rodríguez, F. (2022). Environmental culture and student participation in Latin American universities. Ibero-American Journal of Higher Education, 13(36), 55-74.

Novo, M. (2018). Environmental education and sustainable development. Editorial Universitas.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2021). Education for Sustainable Development: Roadmap. UNESCO Publishing.

Pérez, A. (2020). University environmental management and social responsibility. Journal of Academic Research, 12(4), 88-102.

Rodríguez, J., & Sánchez, L. (2021). Environmental Awareness and Ecological Behavior on College Campuses. Contemporary Environmental Journal, 9(3), 67–81.