|
Published Instituto
Tecnológico Superior Corporativo Edwards Deming. Quito - Ecuador Frequency July - September Vol. 1, No. 30, 2026 Pp 1-19 http://centrosuragraria.com/index.php/revista Dates of receipt Received: April 12, 2026 Approved: June 16, 2026 Corresponding author Creative Commons License Creative Commons License,
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
International.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es |
Julio Gabriel-Ortega
Ashley Macías Salazar
Javier Salvatierra Quinto
Gema Burgos López
Jessica Morán Morán
Ph.D. in Science, PROINPA Foundation,
Cochabamba, Bolivia, j.gabriel@proinpa.org http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9776-9235 Agricultural Engineer, Faculty of Natural Sciences
and Agriculture, Southern Manabí State University.
macias-ashley7150@unesum.edu.ec, https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5449-379X Agricultural Engineer,
Faculty of Natural Sciences and Agriculture, Southern Manabí State
University. salvatierra-javier7146@unesum.edu.ec,
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9738-4740 Master of Science in Agriculture
and Animal Science, independent consultant, Portoviejo, Manabí, Ecuador.
burgosgema38@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0025-3679 Lecturer in the Master’s Program in Agriculture and Animal Science, Graduate Institute of the Southern
Manabí State University, Jipijapa, Ecuador.jessica.moran@unesum.edu.ec , https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6487-1038
Keywords:
coffee
cultivars, logarithmic regression, lesion size, area under the relative lesion
progression curve.
Resumen: Con el objetivo de evaluar el uso del ácido oxálico
para obtener genotipos resistentes al ojo de gallo del cafeto (Mycena
citricolor (Berk. & M.A.Curtis) Sacc.), fue implementado un experimento en un diseño
experimental completamente aleatorio (DCA) desbalanceado con 55 tratamientos en
el laboratorio de Biotecnología de la UNESUM. Se ubicaron 10 genotipos/bandeja
con dos foliolos sueltos/genotipo, totalizando 11 bandejas. Se inoculo cada
foliolo con tres gotas a cada lado de la nervadura a una concentración de 2,25
g/150 mL de ácido oxálico. Se evaluó el tamaño de lesión (TL) con un vernier en
milímetros a partir del tercer día, y se continuó con la lectura diaria,
durante seis días. Con los datos de TL se determinó el área bajo la curva de
progreso de la lesión relativa (ABCPLr), como una medida relativa en el tiempo.
Se realizó el análisis de varianza y la comparación de medias mediante la
prueba múltiple de Tukey (P<0,05), una vez cumplidas los supuestos de
normalidad y homogeneidad de varianzas. Asimismo, se determinó la mejor curva
de ajuste mediante el coeficiente de regresión (R2). Los resultados
determinaron que los genotipos 021-101-4 y 021-101-3, mostraron alta resistencia a la
necrosis causada por el ácido oxálico. El genotipo 021-106-4 fue la más
susceptible al igual que los cultivares Gheisha y Típica, por lo que se
determinó diferentes niveles de resistencia al acido oxálico, variando desde
los más resistentes hasta los más susceptibles. Tanto las progenies como progenitores evaluados tuvieron una curva de
ajuste de regresión logarítmica.
Palabras clave:
cultivares de café, regresión logarítmica, tamaño de lesión, área bajo la curva
de progreso de la lesión relativa.
Introduction
Coffee diseases are caused by microorganisms
such as fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes; coffee rust (Hemileia vastatrix Berk. & Broome)
is the most significant, followed by other diseases such as anthracnose (Colletotrichum coffeanum), gall eye (Mycena
citricolor Berk. & M.A. Curtis), iron spot (Cercospora coffeicolla Berkeley & Curtis), stringy rot (Corticium koleroga), root and stem rot (Rosellinia sp.), leaf scorch or wilt (Phoma costarricenses), pink rot (Corticium salmonicolor), and nematodes (Meloidogyne sp., Pratylenchus sp., and Rotylenchulus
sp.) (Agrios, 2005; López, 2020)
Coffee leaf spot, caused by the basidiomycete
fungus Mycena citricolor (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc. (Agrios, 2005;
Granados et al., 2020), can result in significant economic losses in coffee
production due to defoliation and eventual fruit drop. A maximum infection rate
of 54% was reported following periods of heavy rainfall in coffee plantations
located in an area prone to the disease, such as northern Guatemala; it was
estimated that this level of infection resulted in a 56% loss in production
(Avelino et al., 2018). In Costa Rica, coffee leaf spot has been reported since
1876 (Granados et al., 2020). Cyclical
outbreaks occur approximately every fourteen years, linked to increased
rainfall and the presence of the pathogen (Borbón, 1999).
The last major coffee leaf spot epidemic
occurred in 2010; on that occasion, a 12% decrease (approximately 71,400,000
kg) in the estimated harvest for the production year (2010–2011) was recorded,
resulting in a loss of approximately $60 million USD (Barquero, 2010a; 2010b).
The most affected areas were the Central Valley and the Tarrazú region, also
known as the Los Santos region. Between 1995 and 1998, coffee leaf spot
affected approximately 3,000 ha of coffee plantations, of which 800 ha were
located in the Los Santos region (Borbón, 1999). According to the National
Technical Advisory Committee on ENSO Phenomena of the National Meteorological
Institute (COENOS, 2010), the climatic conditions in 1995, 1998, and 2010 were
similar and corresponded to years of transition from El Niño to La Niña.
The most significant effect of the “eye of
the rooster” is premature leaf drop (Guerra, 2004; Barquero, 2007); this
produces a layer of fresh leaf litter consisting of detached diseased foliage.
There is a highly significant correlation (76%) between the infection index and
the defoliation index ( ) (Granados et al., 2020). Both the asexual phase
(geminiferous bodies) and the sexual phase (basidiocarps) of M. citricolor have been observed on
leaves from different plant species that have fallen and are decomposing on the
ground, both in the forest and in coffee plantations.
Furthermore, Ecuador has significant
coffee-producing capacity, making it one of the few countries in the world that
exports all types of coffee: washed Arabica, natural Arabica, and Robusta. The National Autonomous Institute for
Agricultural and Livestock Research (INIAP) has developed a strategic plan for
genetic improvement aimed at evaluating available germplasm and creating and
developing new genetic material with high yields and adaptability to the
country’s diverse ecosystems (INIAP, 2020).
However, in order to select material
resistant to coffee leaf spot, it is possible to inoculate plants with the
pathogen, which is not always advisable; therefore, the advantage of using the
toxin produced by the pathogen on individual leaflets has been recognized. Rao
and Tewari (1987) observed that necrotic lesions similar to those caused by M. citricolor developed when drops of
oxalic acid solutions were placed on coffee leaves. In liquid culture,
increases in oxalic acid levels followed the fungus’s growth curve. These
results suggest a key role for oxalic acid in the pathogenesis of M. citricolor, and the demonstration of
calcium oxalate formation in this study provides concrete evidence for the
hypothesis of calcium sequestration by the host. Oxalic acid, by lowering the
pH, stimulates the indoleacetic acid oxidase and macerating enzyme systems,
leading to tissue disintegration and leaf drop (Rao & Tewari, 1987).
Additionally, Mycena citricolor is known to synthesize toxins such as oxalic acid
and oxalates, which are secondary metabolites secreted into the environment by
fungi, bacteria, and plants. Oxalates are associated with various processes
occurring in the soil, such as nutrient availability, mineral weathering, or
the precipitation of metal oxalates. Oxalates are also listed among the
low-molecular-weight compounds that indirectly participate in the degradation
of the lignocellulosic complex by fungi, which are considered the most effective
wood degraders (Gadd, 1999; Graz, 2024).
Active regulation of oxalic acid
concentration is related to enzymatic activities; therefore, the biochemistry
of microbial biosynthesis and degradation of oxalic acid has also been
presented (Gadd, 1999; Graz, 2024).
Based on the above, the objective of this
study, as outlined in the preceding paragraphs, was to evaluate the use of oxalic acid to select genotypes resistant to
coffee leaf spot (Mycena citricolor (Berk.
& M.A.
Curtis) Sacc.).
Methodology
The
research was conducted at the Biotechnology Laboratory of the Southern Manabí
State University (UNESUM) in Los Ángeles, Jipijapa, Manabí. It is located at 1°21'10.14" south latitude
and 80°33'50.40" west longitude, at an altitude ranging from 230 to 313
meters above sea level (Gabriel et al., 2024).
The treatments
consisted of 55 coffee genotypes from the coffee breeding program at the
Southern Manabí State University (Table 1).
Table1 .
Coffee accessions used in the study.
|
Treatment |
Genotypes |
|
T1 |
Catimor CIFC-P1 |
|
T2 |
Yellow Bourbon |
|
T3 |
021-100-1 |
|
T4 |
021-100-2 |
|
T5 |
021-100-3 |
|
T6 |
021-100-4 |
|
T7 |
021-100-5 |
|
T8 |
021-100-6 |
|
|
Catimor CIFC-P1 |
|
T9 |
Red Caturra |
|
T10 |
021-101-1 |
|
T11 |
021-101-2 |
|
T12 |
021-101-3 |
|
T13 |
021-101-4 |
|
T14 |
021-101-5 |
|
T15 |
021-101-6 |
|
|
Yellow Bourbon |
|
T16 |
Acawa |
|
T17 |
021-104-1 |
|
T18 |
021-104-2 |
|
T19 |
021-104-3 |
|
T20 |
Yellow Bourbon |
|
T21 |
Typical |
|
T22 |
21-105-1 |
|
T23 |
21-105-2 |
|
T24 |
21-105-3 |
|
T25 |
21-105-4 |
|
T26 |
21-105-5 |
|
T27 |
21-105-6 |
|
T28 |
21-105-7 |
|
T29 |
Arara |
|
T30 |
Catucai 785-15 |
|
T31 |
021-106-1 |
|
T32 |
021-106-2 |
|
T33 |
021-106-3 |
|
T34 |
021-106-4 |
|
T35 |
021-106-5 |
|
T36 |
021-106-6 |
|
T37 |
021-106-7 |
|
T38 |
021-106-8 |
|
T39 |
021-106-9 |
|
T40 |
021-107-1 |
|
T41 |
021-107-2 |
|
|
Arara |
|
T42 |
Gheisha |
|
T43 |
021-108-1 |
|
T44 |
021-108-2 |
|
T45 |
021-108-3 |
|
T46 |
021-108-4 |
|
T47 |
021-108-5 |
|
|
Arara |
|
T48 |
Catucai-2 SL |
|
T49 |
021-109-1 |
|
T50 |
021-109-2 |
|
T51 |
021-109-3 |
|
T52 |
021-109-4 |
|
T53 |
021-109-5 |
|
T54 |
021-109-6 |
|
T55 |
021-109-7 |
Experimental Procedure
The
appropriate concentration of oxalic acid was determined according to Rao’s
(1987) recommendations, resulting in a concentration of 2.25 g/150 mL of
distilled water. This dose was applied to individual leaves, which were placed
in 30 x 40 cm humidity chambers lined with paper towels moistened with
distilled water. Ten leaves were placed in each humidity chamber, and three
drops of oxalic acid were applied to each side of the midrib. Eight humidity
chambers were used. Eleven humidity chambers were used.
The trays were arranged on benches
in the Biotechnology laboratory, with each treatment properly labeled. Lesion
size (LS) measurements began 36 hours after inoculation and continued daily for
six days. A Vernier caliper was used to measure LS in millimeters. LS
measurements were recorded in an Excel database and then analyzed using
Infostat software.
Experimental Design
The experiment was conducted using a
completely randomized unbalanced design (CRUD) with 55 genotypes (treatments)
(Gabriel et al., 2022), which were placed in 11 humidity chambers.
The response variables evaluated
were: relative lesion progress ( ) lesion size (mm)
(TL), and area under the relative lesion progress curve (%) (ABCPLr). This
variable was determined based on LS, as a measure relating LS to time, and was
expressed as a percentage (Gabriel et al., 2017). A regression analysis was
performed between LS and time to determine the regression coefficient (R²),
thereby estimating the best-fit curve.
Statistical Analysis
After verifying that the variables met the assumptions of normality and
homogeneity of variances, and based on the defined “ ” model, an analysis of
variance (ANOVA) was performed to test hypotheses regarding fixed effects, as
well as comparisons of treatment means using Duncan’s test (P < 0.05). The
analysis of variance was also used to estimate the variance components for the
random effects. The analyses were performed using Infostat software (Infostat,
2020).
Normality Test
Results
Table
2 shows the analysis of variance for ABCPLr, which revealed significant
differences (P < 0.05) among the evaluated progenies and parental lines, and
the coefficient of variation (CV) was 22.12%, which is appropriate for this
type of research.
Analysis of variance for ABCPLr.
|
F.V. |
Gl |
SC |
CM |
F |
p-value |
|
Model |
54 |
3,505.17 |
66.91 |
13.94 |
<0.0001 |
|
Genotype |
54 |
3,505.17 |
66.91 |
13.94 |
<0.0001 |
|
Error |
606 |
2,909.15 |
4.80 |
|
|
|
Total |
659 |
6,414.32 |
|
|
|
|
CV (%) |
22.12 |
|
|
|
|
Table 3 shows the analysis of means
using Tukey’s multiple range test (P < 0.05) for the treatments, revealing
significant differences for the ABCPLr variable, where the best treatment was
genotype 021-101-4 with an ABCPLr of 4.64%. Genotype 021-106-4 was the most
susceptible, with an ABCPLr of 14.36%
Different levels of resistance to oxalic acid (synthesized by the coffee
cock’s-eye fungus (Mycena citricolor))
were observed. The genotypes tolerant to infection caused by oxalic acid were
genotypes 021-101-3, 021-104-2, 021-100-6, Catimor CIFC-P1, 021-101-5,
021-100-5, 021-101-2, Yellow Bourbon, 021-101-1, 021-101-6, 021-100-2,
021-109-7, and 021-104-1, with ABCPLr percentages ranging from 4.77% to 8.35%,
respectively (Table 3). The remaining genotypes were susceptible, with ABCPLr
ranging from 8.56% to 14.33%.
Table
3.
Analysis
of means for the ABCPLr of each genotype.
|
Genotype |
ABCPLr (%) |
|
|
021-101-4 |
4.64 |
a |
|
021-101-3 |
4.77 |
b |
|
021-104-2 |
6.10 |
b |
|
021-100-6 |
6.50 |
b |
|
Catimor
CIFC-P1 |
6.94 |
b |
|
021-101-5 |
7.04 |
b |
|
021-100-5 |
7.07 |
b |
|
021-101-2 |
7.51 |
b |
|
Yellow
Bourbon |
7.54 |
b |
|
021-101-1 |
7.67 |
b |
|
021-101-6 |
7.77 |
b |
|
021-100-2 |
8.21 |
b |
|
021-109-7 |
8.25 |
b |
|
021-104-1 |
8.35 |
b |
|
Catucai-2
SL |
8.56 |
c |
|
021-100-3 |
8.74 |
c |
|
Acawa |
8.87 |
c |
|
021-108-4 |
8.88 |
c |
|
021-104-3 |
9.11 |
c |
|
021-109-3 |
9.18 |
c |
|
021-100-4 |
9.37 |
c |
|
021-109-5 |
9.39 |
c |
|
021-109-4 |
9.57 |
c |
|
021-100-1 |
9.62 |
c |
|
021-109-6 |
9.90 |
d |
|
Red
Caturra |
9.92 |
d |
|
021-107-2 |
10.13 |
d |
|
021-109-2 |
10.56 |
e |
|
Arara |
10.96 |
f |
|
021-105-5 |
10.99 |
f |
|
021-106-5 |
11.10 |
f |
|
021-105-3 |
11.10 |
f |
|
021-108-2 |
11.12 |
f |
|
021-109-1 |
11.28 |
g |
|
021-106-7 |
11.31 |
g |
|
021-105-4 |
11.47 |
h |
|
021-106-9 |
11.59 |
i |
|
021-106-3 |
11.59 |
i |
|
021-105-6 |
11.61 |
i |
|
021-105-1 |
11.65 |
i |
|
021-108-3 |
11.74 |
i |
|
021-108-1 |
11.79 |
i |
|
021-106-1 |
11.82 |
i |
|
Catucai
785-15 |
11.89 |
i |
|
021-107-1 |
12.11 |
j |
|
021-106-8 |
12.46 |
k |
|
021-105-2 |
12.89 |
j |
|
021-108-5 |
12.95 |
j |
|
021-106-6 |
13.02 |
j |
|
021-106-2 |
13.24 |
m |
|
Geisha |
13.32 |
n |
|
021-105-7 |
13.44 |
o |
|
Typical |
13.90 |
p |
|
021-106-4 |
14.33 |
q |
|
DSH |
3.70 |
|
Table 4 and Figure 1 show a distinct
pattern in the regression curve for the leaves due to the effect of oxalic acid
on the evaluated genotypes.
In family 021-100, it was determined
that the progeny followed a logarithmic fit with a regression coefficient R²=
0.84. The female parent, Catimor CIFC-P1, had
an R² coefficient of 0.84, and the male parent, Yellow Bourbon, had an R² coefficient of 0.80; both showed a better fit to a
logarithmic curve.
Table 4.
Regression coefficient (R²
) for the best fit of the TL development curve over time.
|
Cultivar |
R² coefficient of a linear curve |
R² coefficient of a logarithmic curve |
|
Catimor
CIFC-P1 |
0.63 |
0.84 |
|
Yellow
Bourbon |
0.58 |
0.80 |
|
021-100 |
0.53 |
0.84 |
|
Catimor
CIFC-P1 |
0.63 |
0.98 |
|
Red
Caturra |
0.69 |
0.88 |
|
021-101 |
0.87 |
0.96 |
|
Yellow
Bourbon |
0.63 |
0.89 |
|
Acawa |
0.48 |
0.50 |
|
021-104 |
0.70 |
0.84 |
|
Yellow
Bourbon |
0.51 |
0.74 |
|
Tipica |
0.57 |
0.80 |
|
021-105 |
0.48 |
0.80 |
|
Arara |
0.63 |
0.85 |
|
Catucaí
785-15 |
0.46 |
0.70 |
|
021-106 |
0.57 |
0.76 |
|
021-107 |
0.48 |
0.71 |
|
Arara |
0.56 |
0.59 |
|
Geisha |
0.37 |
0.77 |
|
021-108 |
0.32 |
0.59 |
|
Arara |
0.57 |
0.86 |
|
Catucaí-2L
SL |
0.57 |
0.72 |
|
021-109 |
0.57 |
0.77 |
In family 021-101, it was determined that the progeny had a logarithmic
fit with a regression coefficient of R2= 0.84. The female
Catimor parent CIFC-P1 had
an R²of 0.84, and the male red Caturra
parent had an R²of 0.80, indicating
a better fit to a logarithmic curve.
In family 021-104, it was determined
that the progeny followed a logarithmic fit with a regression coefficient of R2=
0.84. The female Bourbon Yellow parent (R²= 0.89) and the male Acawa
parent (R²= 0.50) also showed a better fit to a logarithmic curve.
In family 021-105, it was determined
that the progeny followed a logarithmic fit with a regression coefficient of R²=
0.80. The female Bourbon yellow parent
(R2= 0.74) and the male Típica parent (R2= 0.80)
also showed a better fit to a logarithmic curve.
In family 021-106, it was determined
that the progeny followed a logarithmic curve with a regression coefficient of R²=
0.80. The female parent Arara (R²=
0.85) and the male parent Catucaí 785-15 (R²=
0.70) also showed a better fit to a logarithmic curve.
In family 021-107, it was determined
that the progeny followed a logarithmic fit with a regression coefficient of R²=
0.71.
In family 021-108, the progeny was
found to follow a logarithmic curve with a regression coefficient of R²=
0.59. The female parent Arara (R²=
0.77) and the male parent Gheisha (R²= 0.77) also showed a better
fit to a logarithmic curve.
In family 021-109, it was determined
that the progeny had a logarithmic fit with a regression coefficient of R²=
0.59. The female parent Arara (R²=
0.86) and the male parent Catucaí-2L SL (R²=
0.77) also showed a better fit to a logarithmic curve.
Figure 1. Regression fit curves for coffee
progenies and parents inoculated with oxalic acid
We observed a variety of responses
to oxalic acid. The least affected (most resistant) genotype was 021-101-4, a
cross between Catimor CIFC-P1 and Yellow Bourbon. Both parents were moderately
resistant, indicating that genes conferring resistance to Mycena citricolor were transferred to some of their progeny. The
parent cultivars—Acawa, Red Caturra, Arara,
Catucai 785-15, Geisha, and Typica—were susceptible. In this regard, Castro et
al. (2024) found moderate resistance in the parent cultivars Catimor CIFC-P1
and Catucai-2 SL and susceptibility in all other cultivars evaluated. These
results are consistent with those observed in our study.
Castro et
al. (2024) determined that the yellow
Bourbon parent was the most susceptible to Mycena
citricolor under field conditions. In our study, we determined that this
parent exhibited moderate resistance. This contradiction is possibly due to the
absence of environmental effects in the laboratory setting. It is known that Mycena citricolor thrives in
environments with high humidity and cool temperatures, primarily affecting
leaves and fruits, which causes them to drop (Avelino et al., 2018).
The
economic impact of this disease varies across different coffee-growing regions
in Latin America. In Puerto Rico, losses of up to 75% have been estimated; in
Costa Rica, up to 15% of the total hectares planted with coffee have been
affected; and in Guatemala, an incidence of 49% of this disease has been
reported (Vidal et al., 2021). In
Honduras, the Arabica coffee cultivars most tolerant to “ojo de gallo” were
Típica, Bourbon, Catuai, Pacas, and Caturra; and the most susceptible were
IHCAFE 90, Lempira, Parainema, other Catimores, and Sarchimores (Yizard, 2018).
Oxalic acid and oxalates are secondary metabolites
secreted into the surrounding environment by fungi, bacteria, and plants.
Oxalates are linked to a variety of soil processes, such as nutrient
availability, mineral weathering, and the precipitation of metal oxalates
(Graz, 2024).
The exact mechanism by which Mycena citricolor infection develops is unclear [National Service
for Health, Safety, and Food Quality (SENASICA, 2014)]; however, it is believed
that the fungus’s dispersal structures (spores) release oxalic acid onto the
leaf blade, which alters the pH and induces the production of enzymes that
degrade cell walls. Once the fungus has established itself within the plant, it
likely uses the plant’s metabolism to feed, degrading the metabolic energy
contained in reserve carbohydrates, as is the case with other fungi (Vargas,
2003; Foster et al., 2003; Barquero,
2011). In our study, we applied oxalic acid, a secondary metabolite secreted by
Mycena citricolor, to destroy the
cellular tissue of the leaves (Rao & Tewari, 1987).
Regarding the genotypes’ response to infection and
lesion development on coffee leaves caused by oxalic acid, we observed distinct
responses; in all cases
analyzed—including both progenies and parents—the genotypes exhibited a
logarithmic fit curve. Similar results were found when studying UNESUM’s coffee
germplasm, where the Catimor CIFC-P1, Yellow Bourbon, and Acawa cultivars
showed a logarithmic fit (Gabriel et al., 2026). In this regard, it is known
that coffee
leaf rust is more dependent on the amount of primary inoculum than on the
infection rate (r), which implies that
implementing management strategies that reduce the initial inoculum level would
significantly delay the development of the epidemic (Wang and
Arauz, 1999), thereby reducing production and
economic losses. This value (r) represents an
increase in the amount of inoculum or disease (incidence or severity) and can
be calculated in days, weeks, or years; in general, the value of r for
multi-cycle diseases is higher than the r (rm) of monocyclic diseases (Agrios, 2005).
This value
allows for comparisons between epidemics—for example, those occurring over
several years or under different conditions—and also enables comparisons and
correlations among the various elements and stages of an epidemic, such as
primary inoculum, spore release, latent period, infectious period, and others (Achicanoy,
2000). It can be considered a measure of
disease risk and is one of the three key epidemiological parameters for
developing management strategies; the others are the amount of initial inoculum
(y0) and the time (t) during which
the pathogen and host interact. The value of r in diseases with multiple cycles
is the most important factor for establishing management guidelines that reduce
disease in an agroecologically and economically sustainable manner (Nutter, 2007). If the apparent infection rate is low, reducing the
initial disease level slows the progression of the disease (Arauz, 2011). Granados et al. (2020) determined that the disease
followed a logistic growth curve for epidemics, which provided the best fit.
This indicates that the progression of the disease depends on several factors
(primary inoculum, spore release, latent period, infectious period, and others)
and that it is a polycyclic disease.
Conclusions
Genotypes 021-101-4 and 021-101-3
showed high resistance to necrosis caused by oxalic acid. Genotype 021-106-4
was the most susceptible, as were the cultivars Gheisha and Típica; thus,
different levels of resistance to oxalic acid were determined, ranging from the
most resistant to the most susceptible.
Both the progenies and the parent
lines evaluated had a logarithmic regression fit curve.
Acknowledgments
To the Coffee Genetic Improvement
Project – Phase III, part of the Master’s Program in Agriculture and Livestock
at the Southern Manabí State University
References
Achicanoy, H. (2000). Quantitative description of
plant epidemics. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron.,
53:941-968.
Agrios, G. (2005). Plant Pathology.5thed.
Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Arauz, L.F. (2011). Plant Pathology: An Agroecological
Approach. 2nd ed. University of Costa Rica Press, San José, CRI.
Avelino, J., Allinne, C., Cerda, R.,
Willocquet, L., & Savary, S. (2018). Multiple-disease system in coffee:
from crop loss assessment to sustainable management. Annual Review of
Phytopathology 56, 611-635. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-050117
Barquero, M. (2010b).
Coffee farmers lost 12% of their harvest due to rain and pests. La Nación,
CRI. https://www.nacion.com/economia/cafetaleros-perdieron-12-de-cosecha-por-lluvia-yplagas/6NKK6NCILRDDXESMW5PN7PURJY/story/
Barquero, M. (2007). Some considerations on the “ojo
de gallo” disease. Rev. Infor Icafe,
1:11–15.
Barquero, M. (2010a). More than 75,000 fanegas of
coffee were lost due to “rooster’s eye.” La Nación, CRI.
https://www.nacion.com/economia/mas-de-75-000-fanegas-de-cafe-se-perdieron-por-ojo-de-gallo/N6HUXV5ALZBBTPJQLCBEIFZ3V4/story/
(accessed May 13, 2011).
Barquero, M. (2011). Some considerations on the “ojo de gallo.” Revista informativa, 11–15. https://www.icafe.cr/wp-content/uploads/revista_informativa/Revista-I-Sem-11.pdf
Borbón, O. (1999). Considerations on the problem of
the lemon mycena (Mycena citricolor) in Costa Rica. 1999. In: College of
Agricultural Engineers, eds., “Proceedings” of the XI Agronomic Congress / IV
National Congress of Plant Pathology.
College of Agricultural Engineers, CRI. pp. 21–25
Castro, C., García, M., Ayón,
F., Narváez, W., González, M., & Hoppe, C. (2024). Determination
of the incidence of three leaf diseases in 20 Arabica coffee cultivars (Coffea arabica L.). Conocimiento Global, 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.70165/cglobal.v9i2.380
COENOS (National Technical Advisory Commission on the
ENSO Phenomenon). (2010). Possible La Niña phenomenon. ENSO
Bulletin 33:1-6.
Foster, A.J., Jenkinson, J.M., & Talbot, N.J. (2003). Trehalose synthesis and metabolism are
required at different stages of plant infection by Magnaporthe grisea. EMBO J., 22(2):225-35. doi:
10.1093/emboj/cdg018
Gabriel, J., Gutierréz, J., Burgos,
G., Flores, H., & Morán, J. (2026). Genetic improvement of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) for the southern
region of Manabí (in preparation)
Gabriel, J., Merchán, L., Lagos, J., Fuentes, T., Morán, J., & Burgos, G. (2024). Morphological characterization of wild tomatoes (Solanum sp.) on the grounds of the Southern Manabí State University, Ecuador. Centrosur Agraria, 1(23). https://doi.org/10.37959/revista.v1i23.274
Gabriel, J., Ortuño, N., Vera, M., Castro, C.,
Narváez, W., Manobanda, M. (2017). Manual for Assessing Disease Damage in Agricultural
Crops. COMPAS Group, Southern Manabí State University, Jipijapa, Ecuador. 53 p.
https://repositorio.unesum.edu.ec/bitstream/53000/2093/1/MANUAL%20PARA%20EVALUACION.pdf
Gabriel,
J., Valverde, A., Indacochea, B., Castro, C., Vera, M., Alcívar, J., &
Vera, R. (2022). Experimental
Designs: Theory and Practice for Agricultural Experiments. Mawil
Publicaciones, Quito, Ecuador. https://doi.org/10.26820/978-9942-602-26-8
Gadd, G. M. (1999). Fungal production of citric and oxalic acid:
importance in metal speciation, physiology, and biogeochemical processes. Adv. Microb. Physiol., 41:47–92. doi:
10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60165-4. PMID: 10500844.
Granados, M. del M., Avelino, J., Arauz, F., Castro,
S., & Ureña, N. (2020). Leaf litter and Mycena
citricolor inoculum in the American leaf spot epidemic. Agronomía
Mesoamericana, 31(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v31i1.36614
Graz, M. (2024). Role of oxalic acid in fungal and
bacterial metabolism and its biotechnological potential. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 40(6):178. doi:
10.1007/s11274-024-03973-5.
Guerra, B. (2004). Experiences in managing fungal
diseases in coffee (Coffea arabica) cultivation on smallholder farms in the
village of La Montaña, Moyuta, Jutiapa. Bachelor’s thesis, University of San
Carlos, San Carlos, GTM
InfoStat. (2020). Statistical
analysis software. https://www.infostat.com.ar/
INIAP. (2020). Arabica Coffee, National Institute of Agricultural and
Livestock Research (INIAP):
http://tecnologia.iniap.gob.ec/index.php/explore2/mcafec/rcafea
INIAP. (2020). Arabica Coffee. Retrieved from National
Institute of Agricultural and Livestock Research (INIAP):
http://tecnologia.iniap.gob.ec/index.php/explore-2/mcafec/rcafea
López, N. (2020). Coffee Manual: Good Production and Environmental
Practices, Using Entomopathogenic Fungi for Pest and Disease Control.
Nicaragua: Friends of the Earth Spain. Spanish Agency for International
Development Cooperation (AECID). ECODES and INPRHU-Somoto
Nutter, F.W. (2007). The role of plant disease
epidemiology in developing successful integrated disease management programs.
In: A. Ciancio and K.G. Mukerji (eds.), General concepts in integrated pest and
disease management. Springer, Dordrecht, NED. pp. 45–79.
doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6061-8_3
Rao, D.V., & Tewari, J.P. (1987).
Production of Oxalic Acid by Mycena
citricolor, the Causal Agent of American Leaf Spot of Coffee. Physiology and Biochemistry, 77(8),
780–785. DOI: 10.1094/Phyto-77-780.
SENASICA. (2014). Mycena
citricolor (Berkeley & Curtis) (Coffee Leaf Spot). Technical Data Sheet, 49, 1-16.
https://prod.senasica.gob.mx/SIRVEF/ContenidoPublico/Roya%20cafeto/.pdf
Vargas, E. (1984). Interaction of biological and chemical treatments in controlling the chicken eye fungus (Mycena citricolor) in coffee plants. Agronomía costarricense, 8(2):91-97. https://www.mag.go.cr/rev_agr/v08n02_091.pdf
Vidal, N., Rosalba, D., Sánchez, J., Chiquito, R., González, D., & Sánchez, G. (2021). Antagonistic microorganisms: an alternative for the biological control of diseases. Agrarian Economics 117(3): 214-226, https://www.aida-itea.org/aida-itea/files/itea/revistas/2021/117-3/214-226%20ITEA%20117-3.pdf
Wang, A., & L.F. Arauz. (1999). Application of
epidemiological principles to combat coffee leaf spot. In: College of
Agricultural Engineers, eds., “Proceedings” of the XI Agronomic Congress / IV
National Congress of Plant Pathology. College of Agricultural Engineers, CRI.
pp. 9–12.
Yizard, C. (2018). Economically Significant
Diseases of Coffee. Regional Course on Innovative Coffee Farming, Honduras
2018. Honduras: Honduran Coffee Institute (IHCAFE).