Analysis in municipal markets for the
evaluation of the hygienic quality of beef
Análisis en Mercados municipales para la evaluación de la
calidad higiénica de la carne bovina
Alisson Alexandra Robinzon Olaya
1
Shirley del Rosario Cornejo Lozano
2
William Efrain Rosas Carrera
3
Israel Emilio Marquez Cabrera
4
Ana Lucía Piña Paucar
5
Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of
E. coli/Coliforms in beef marketed in the Municipal Markets of
Northeastern Guayaquil in order to determine the microbiological
quality of meat products. The research work was carried out in the
laboratory, with descriptive, exploratory and non-experimental
knowledge. Using the Petrifilm plate culture system, a total of 84 beef
samples obtained from 5 municipal markets with a total of 42 stalls
dedicated to the sale of meat products were evaluated during two
weeks. The results determined that 96% of the samples showed CFU
of E. coli and Coliforms and 4% showed the presence of CFU of
Coliforms and E. coli. Coli, resulting in a total value of 94% (79) of
samples unfit for human consumption and a lower percentage of fit
samples represented by 6% (5). In turn, these results could be related
to the application of Good Manufacturing Practices where it was
established that none of the stalls complied with the regulations;
therefore, better control by the corresponding authorities is
recommended in order to maintain food safety for the population.
Keywords: Coli, GMP, Beef, Coliforms, CFU
Resumen: El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la
presencia de E.Coli/Coliformes en carnes bovinas comercializadas en
los Mercados Municipales del Noreste de Guayaquil para determinar
la calidad microbiológica de los productos cárnicos. El trabajo de
investigación se ejecutó en laboratorio, con conocimientos
descriptivos, exploratorios y no experimentales. Mediante el sistema
de cultivo en Placas Petrifilm se pudieron evaluar durante dos
semanas un total de 84 muestras de carne bovina, obtenidas de 5
mercados municipales con un total de 42 puestos dedicados a la venta
de productos cárnicos. Los resultados determinaron que el 96% de las
muestras presentaron UFC de E. Coli y Coliformes y el 4% presencia
de UFC de Coliformes y E. Coli, dando como resultado un valor total
de 94% (79) de muestras no aptas para el consumo humano y un
porcentaje menor de muestras aptas representada con el 6% (5). A su
vez, estos resultados podrían estar relacionados con la aplicación de
Buenas Prácticas de Manufactura donde se estableció que ninguno de
Published
Instituto Tecnológico Superior Edwards
Deming. Quito Ecuador
Periodicity
January-March
Vol. 1, Num. 21, 2024
pp. 25-39
http://centrosuragraria.com/index.php/revista
Dates of receipt
Received: December 08, 2023
Approved: February 02, 2024
Correspondence author
info@uagraria.edu.ec
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons License, Attribution-
NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
International.https://creativecommons.org/lice
nses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es
1
Msc., Universidad Agraria del Ecuador
info@uagraria.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1229-3384
2
Msc., Universidad Agraria del Ecuador
scornejo@uagraria.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7579-3541
3
Msc., Universidad Agraria del Ecuador
wrosas@uagraria.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1128-6062
4
Msc., Universidad Agraria del Ecuador
Imarquez@uagraria.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9874-9518
5
Msc., Universidad Agraria del Ecuador
apina@uagraria.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-9862
Analysis in municipal markets for the evaluation of the hygienic quality of beef.
26
los puestos cumplía con la normativa, por lo que se recomienda un
mejor control por parte de las autoridades correspondientes para
mantener la inocuidad alimentaria de la población.
Palabras clave: Coli, BPM, carne bovina, Coliformes, UFC
Introduction
From 1973 to 1987 in the United States, 48% of the outbreaks identified
as pathogens were related to specific foods such as beef, eggs, pork,
poultry, fish and shellfish, carcasses and crustaceans. or dairy products.
(Pardo Baron, 2020). This finding highlights the critical importance of
implementing Good Manufacturing Practices. These methods include a
series of processes used in both food preparation and processing stages,
whose main objective is to ensure food safety.
(Hidalgo & Yahaira, 2019) They point out that beef plays an important
role in human nutrition, providing essential nutrients such as iron, zinc
and selenium, as well as antioxidants and bioactive compounds that
help promote bone health and mental health. In Ecuador, the meat
industry shows an evolving structure that can improve efficiency
through modernization. Domestic livestock density is 1.48 animals/ha,
lower than international standards and can reach 5 animals/ha. Globally,
the cattle industry has demonstrated its resilience and beef production
is expected to increase by 1% in 2022 compared to the previous year.
In recent decades, the agricultural sector has been positively affected by
innovation and increasing technological density, which can be observed
in many other areas of activity. At the same time, the global structure
of this activity has changed significantly, making the increased demand
for meat a great opportunity for livestock farmers, mainly domestic.
Although compliance with hygiene standards during the production,
processing and sale of meat products is unpredictable. (FAO, 2019).
According to, Vélez (Diagnosis Of The Slaughtering Process And The
Microbiological Quality Of Bovine Meat In The Camal Del Gad
Municipal Del Cantón Bolívar, 2019). Meat is one of the most
perishable foods due to its high water and nutrient content, which
creates the conditions for microorganisms to grow. Microbial
multiplication is the main cause of the poor quality of beef, causing a
gradual deterioration of the organoleptic properties of the meat,
therefore it is important to determine the type and quantity of
microorganisms present because they are factors that shorten the shelf
life of the meat. (AND19).
April - June vol. 1. Num. 21 - 2024
27
Meat in general is very susceptible to the presence of many different
types of microorganisms, which is why most bacteria are capable of
multiplying and rapidly decomposing meat products (Costa, 2019).
Fresh meat shrinks, loses weight and is rapidly exposed to bacteria from
the air, hands, cleaning products and vehicles. Because bacterial growth
increases as temperature and humidity increase, the greatest danger
occurs in the tropics; for this reason, when refrigeration is not available,
meat is generally retailed within 12 hours after slaughter, even if there
is a risk of loss due to shrinkage, wastage and spoilage.
The presence of a large amount of bacteria in food products is a clear
indication of poor manufacturing practices, leading to high microbial
loads. This situation, in turn, leads to a significant increase in morbidity
and mortality from foodborne diseases. (Ministry of Public Health,
2021).. It is important to increase compliance with good manufacturing
practices and good agricultural practices at all stages of the food chain,
from production to processing and distribution of food. Effective
implementation of these measures helps to reduce public health risks
and also improves food quality and consumer confidence.
Implementing different methods to determine food quality is an
excellent strategy to improve control of the wholesomeness of the final
product. Continuously educating food manufacturers, processors and
handlers about the importance of these practices is key to preventing
contamination and ensuring food safety. The immediate identification
of microbial populations is of great importance in the fight against
outbreaks of foodborne disease (FOD), 50% of which are caused by the
consumption of meat with a high microbial load. (Cardozo, 2020).
Key factors affecting beef include safety, microbial growth during
storage and microbial spoilage. Effectiveness in determining beef
quality is achieved primarily through microbiological testing, which is
necessary to ensure product safety for consumers. However, consumer
perception of quality is more complex since it is based on the external
and internal characteristics of the meat, including aspects such as flavor,
texture, odor and appearance (Hernández, Ledesma, Ángel, & Arizala,
2021)..
The increase in problems related to poor meat quality can be attributed
to a large extent to the inadequate implementation of Good
Manufacturing Practices during the slaughter process. This situation
highlights the crucial importance of compliance with these regulations,
since their enforcement is essential to guarantee the safety of meat
products. Effective implementation not only minimizes the risk of
bacterial contamination and other food safety hazards, but also
Analysis in municipal markets for the evaluation of the hygienic quality of beef.
28
improves the overall quality of the meat, ensuring that the product
reaches the final consumer in a safe and high quality manner.
In this sense, (Bravo & Ramos, 2021) emphasize the need for strict
compliance with GMP regulations as a key factor in improving food
safety. This approach not only benefits public health by reducing the
risk of foodborne diseases, but also strengthens consumer confidence in
meat products and in the food system as a whole. Therefore,
implementing these measures is fundamental for meat producers who
want to stand out in a market that is increasingly conscious of food
quality and safety. (Dier, 2007)
according to the Ecuador Census Portal (Rodriguez, 2023) Guayaquil
has a growing population of 2,746,403, predominantly urban (2.6
million) and a slight female predominance, which underscores the
importance of ensuring safe and effective food handling. This is
especially true for meat products sold in urban markets in the northeast
of the city. The high consumption of these products, combined with
limited public knowledge about the quality, origin and handling of food
during processing, poses serious problems from a food safety point of
view.
This context becomes even more relevant when considering the 5,890
cases of foodborne illness reported in Ecuador in 2020, (Ministry of
Public Health, 2021) which highlights the urgent need for public health
authorities to increase surveillance of hygiene measures in these retail
outlets. Strict implementation of good manufacturing practices, and
increased hygiene inspections in urban markets are essential to reduce
the risk of foodborne illness (FBD), thus contributing to protecting the
human health of the vast majority of Guayaquil's urban residents and
improving food safety at the national level.
Materials and methods
The research work is of a laboratory and field nature, with descriptive,
exploratory and explanatory knowledge to perform adequate
microbiological analysis in the laboratory and determine the prevalence
of contamination by dE. Coli / Coliforms in beef marketed in the
market. Northeast of Guayaquil. The design of the study was not
experimental in nature since no variables were modified and the data
obtained were only descriptive.
April - June vol. 1. Num. 21 - 2024
29
For the sampling, a non-random sampling design was applied, in which
beef samples were collected from the urban markets of northeastern
Guayaquil, a complex made up of five urban markets with a total of 42
stalls dedicated to the sale of beef. Mercado Municipal Este, Mercado
Florida Norte, Mercado Municipal Gómez Rendon, Mercado Municipal
"Bastión Popular" and Mercado Sauces IV. Sampling was carried out
during three consecutive weeks and a total of 84 beef samples were
collected and analyzed using the Petrifilm E. Coli/Coliforms counting
system in the hexagonal laboratory of the Universidad Agrícola del
Ecuador.
In this study, the standards established by NTE INEN 1338 (Third
revision) related to meat and meat products were followed, which
includes guidelines for raw, cured-matured and precooked-cooked meat
products, as established by the. (INEN, 2016). The presence or absence
of Escherichia coli and Coliforms was investigated as the dependent
variable. The independent variables considered included: markets in the
Northeast of Guayaquil, Coliform Forming Units, frequency of samples
complying with INEN regulations and implementation of Good
Manufacturing Practices (GMP).
3. Result
The 84 beef samples were obtained from the 5 municipal markets in the
northeast of Guayaquil, with a total of 42 stalls dedicated to the sale of
meat, one sample was taken per stall in two weeks.
Table 1. Presence or absence of E. coli in beef sold in different markets
in the northeast of Guayaquil.
Source: Test results in percentage of the presence and absence of
E.Coli.
Prepared by: The authors, 2023
The analysis in Table 1 shows alarming data on the food safety of
beef sold in the northeastern markets of Guayaquil. A total of 84
Presence of E.Coli
Absence of E.Coli
Number of
samples
81
3
Total% Total
96%
4%
Analysis in municipal markets for the evaluation of the hygienic quality of beef.
30
samples were analyzed and 81 of them were positive for Escherichia
coli, which represents an alarming 96% of the samples analyzed. Only
4%, equivalent to 3 samples, were free of this pathogen. This high
proportion of E. coli highlights the urgent need to review and reinforce
control and management measures in these establishments.
Table 2 shows the opposite situation for coliforms, where only 4% of
the samples (3 of 84) were positive, while the vast majority of 96% (81
of 84) were free of coliforms. These results show clear differences in
the occurrence of these two microbiological indicators in beef sold,
suggesting different levels of public health risks.
Table 2. Presence or Absence of Coliforms in beef sold in different
markets in the Northeast of Guayaquil.
Source: Results in percentage of presence and absence of Coliforms.
Prepared by: The authors, 2023
For Table 3, the following aspects should be considered than the
presence of E. coli and coliforms since it indicates the proportion of
stalls that tested positive for each bacterium during the weeks of
analysis. Specific CFU (Colony Forming Units per gram) values vary
significantly and reflect the degree of contamination.
Table 3. Presence of E.Coli/Coliforms in municipal markets of
Guayaquil.
Presence
of E. coli
(Week 1)
Presence
of E. coli
(Week 2)
Presence
of
Coliforms
(Week 1)
Presence
of
Coliforms
(Week 2)
Remarks
100%
(18/18
positions)
100%
(18/18
positions)
Not
detected
Not
detected
High variability
in E. coli counts
Presence of coliforms
Absence of Coliforms
Number of samples
3
81
Total% Total
4%
96%
April - June vol. 1. Num. 21 - 2024
31
100%
(6/6
positions)
100%
(6/6
positions)
Not
detected
Not
detected
Consistently low
E. coli counts
100%
(3/3
positions)
Varied
100%
(3/3
positions)
Varied
33%
detected
(1/3
positions)
Not
detected
Notable increase
of E.Coli in
Week 2
100%
detected
(3/3
positions)
100%
detected
(3/3
positions)
Not
detected
33%
detected
(1/3
positions)
E.Coli present in
all samples
100%
detected
(12/12
positions)
100%
detected
(12/12
positions)
Not
detected
Not
detected
Maximum
observed E.coli
counts
Source: E.coli and Coliform count results in Petrifilm dishes.
Prepared by: The authors, 2023
According to the microbiological studies carried out in the municipal
markets of Guayaquil, shown in Table 3, the prevalence of E. coli and
coliforms in the beef sold is alarming. The incidence of these pathogens
varied significantly in several markets, indicating the urgency of
implementing more rigorous measures to ensure food safety. In
particular, the North Florida market showed a high presence of E. coli,
with a notable increase in the detection of coliforms in the second week
of analysis. Considering that coliforms are common indicators of fecal
contamination, this finding suggests deficiencies in food hygiene and
handling practices.
The Bastión Popular Municipal Market, on the other hand, maintained
E. coli levels below the limits established by NTE INEN 1338. This
result demonstrates that Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) are
effective and that sanitary control is crucial to prevent food
contamination. However, the coincidence in the low levels of E. coli
contrasts with the variability observed in other markets, highlighting
the differences in sanitary conditions and handling practices between
different points of sale.
The presence of E. coli and Coliforms in meat products not only
represents a direct risk to public health, but also demonstrates the
variability in the implementation of food safety practices. The variation
in results between markets and positions within markets shows
significant variations in management and hygienic conditions. This
Analysis in municipal markets for the evaluation of the hygienic quality of beef.
32
situation demonstrates how crucial it is to take a holistic approach to
improving food safety. This approach should include strengthening
sanitary regulations and enforcement, as well as training vendors in
basic elements of food hygiene.
Table 4. Results obtained from microbiological analyses and the Good
Manufacturing Practices manual.
BPM Category
Presence of E.
coli
Presence of
Coliforms
Remarks
Gloves
Positive majority
unused
1 negative
sample with
use;
majority
negative
without use
Glove use critical
for E. coli control,
less influence on
Coliforms
Apron
Positives with
and without use
2 positives
with use;
negatives
without use
Apron does not
significantly impact
the presence of E.
coli.
Cofia
Positives with
and without use
5 positives
with use;
negatives
without use
Use of coping does
not reduce the
presence of E. coli,
similar impact on
coliforms.
Closed Footwear
Positives with
and without use
1 positive
with use;
negative
without use
Closed footwear
essential to control
E. Coli, similar for
Coliforms
Hand Washing
2 negative
samples;
majority positive
1 positive;
majority
negative
Handwashing
critical to reduce E.
coli, important for
Coliform control
Closed
Containers
(Waste)
Positive majority
with and without
use
2 negatives
with use;
most
negatives
without use
Waste management
important for E. coli
control, Coliforms
less affected
Garbage Bags
(Waste)
Positive majority
1 positive;
majority
negative
Garbage bags
influence E. coli
control, but not so
much Coliforms.
Ventilated Area
(Waste)
Positive majority
All negative
Ventilation
minimally affects E.
coli, no impact on
coliforms.
April - June vol. 1. Num. 21 - 2024
33
Pest Control
(Residues)
All positive
1 positive;
majority
negative
Pest control
essential for E. coli
management, similar
for Coliforms.
Waste Deposit
(Infrastructure)
Positive majority
1 positive;
majority
negative
Waste management
critical to E. coli
management, less
impact on Coliforms
Signage
(Infrastructure)
All positive
All negative
Signage does not
directly impact the
presence of E. coli,
does not affect
coliforms.
Clean Floors
(Infrastructure)
Positive majority
3 positive;
majority
negative
Floor cleaning
important for E. coli
control, also relevant
for Coliforms.
Drainage
(Infrastructure)
Positive majority
1 positive;
majority
negative
Drainage essential
for E. coli
management, similar
for Coliforms
Clean Steel Areas
(Infrastructure)
Positive majority
3 positive;
majority
negative
Cleanliness of steel
areas influences E.
coli control, also
relevant for
Coliforms.
Refrigerator
(Utensils and
Equipment)
All positive
unused
3 negative
with use;
majority
positive
without use
Refrigeration crucial
for E. Coli
management,
important for
Coliforms
Freezer (Utensils
and Equipment)
Divided between
positive and
negative
3 positive;
majority
negative
Freezing impacts the
presence of E. coli
and coliforms.
Stainless Steel
Utensils (Utensils
and Equipment)
Positive majority
3 positive;
majority
negative
Stainless steel
utensils important
for E. Coli control,
similar for
Coliforms
Operation of
Freezers (Utensils
and Equipment)
Positive majority
3 positive;
majority
negative
Proper freezer
operation essential
for handling E. coli,
important for
Coliforms
Source: Comparison of E.coli and Coliform GMP compliance results.
Prepared by: The authors, 2023
Analysis in municipal markets for the evaluation of the hygienic quality of beef.
34
Table 4 shows the importance of using gloves to avoid E. coli
contamination. In contrast to the impact on the presence of coliforms, it
is necessary to use personal hygiene methods to control the presence of
some pathogens in food. On the other hand, products such as aprons and
aprons did not significantly reduce these pathogens, indicating that the
use of protective equipment alone is not sufficient to ensure food safety.
To avoid E. coli contamination, waste disposal must include proper
containers and locations. This highlights the importance of having
adequate infrastructure and effective cleaning techniques in food
markets.
Personal hygiene practices appear to have less impact on the presence
of coliforms than on the presence of E. coli. Some practices, such as
hand washing and proper waste disposal, are crucial to control E. coli.
Contamination by these pathogens can be reduced by the use of
stainless steel utensils and proper operation of refrigeration and freezing
equipment.
In Table N° 5, of the 84 samples that were fit for human consumption,
6% (5) belonged to the North Florida Municipal Market, 1% (1) to the
East Municipal Market and the Sauces IV Municipal Market, while the
Gómez Rendon Municipal Market and the Bastión Popular Municipal
Market did not present any sample of beef fit for consumption.
Table 5. Frequency of suitable and unsuitable samples in the different
markets described by INEN 1338.
"MUNICIPAL
MARKETS OF
NORTHEASTERN
GUAYAQUIL".
ADEQUATE
SAMPLES
(M)1.0 X 102
INELIGIBLE
SAMPLES
(M)1.0 X 103
NO AP %
NO AP %
NO AP %
NO AP %
NO AP %
NO AP %
NO AP %
NO AP %
NO AP
AP % AP
% AP %
AP % AP
% AP %
AP % AP
% AP %
AP % AP
% AP %
NORTH
FLORIDA
MUNICIPAL
MARKET
3
33
39%
4%
EAST
MUNICIPAL
MARKET
1
5
6%
1%
April - June vol. 1. Num. 21 - 2024
35
MUNICIPAL
MARKET
GOMEZ
RENDON
0
24
29%
0%
SAUCES IV
MUNICIPAL
MARKET
1
5
6%
1%
BASTION
POPULAR
MUNICIPAL
MARKET
0
12
14%
0%
TOTAL
5
79
94%
6%
Results of samples fit and unfit for human consumption.
Robinzon,2023
On the other hand, 94% (79) of the remaining samples were unfit for
human consumption, being the Florida Norte Municipal Market the one
with the highest number of unfit samples with a total of 39% (33),
followed by the Gómez Rendon Municipal Market with 29% (24),
while the East Municipal Market and Sauces IV Municipal Market
reflected the same values of unfit samples of 6% (5) and the Bastión
Popular Municipal Market with 14% (12). The results collected indicate
that there is a higher bacterial contamination of E. coli than of
Coliforms analyzed, as shown in Table 1 and 2.
4. Conclusions
In the present study, it can be concluded that all the markets where beef
samples were taken for microbiological analysis had high levels of E.
coli since most of their samples in the first and second week of the study
showed values < 1.0X. 102, meaning that the rate of E. coli presence
was 96%. However, only 4% coliform bacteria were detected, which is
a completely low result compared to E.Coli. When comparing the
results of the microbiological analyses with the GMP, it is possible to
identify non-compliances with the regulations, as the vast majority of
supermarkets in their tests showed that the presence of microorganisms
indicates poor hygiene. A small number of samples were considered fit
for human consumption (6%), while the vast majority of samples
complied with the permissible CFU values described in the NTE INEN
1338 standard, with 94% due to the fact that the application of GMP is
not good.
Analysis in municipal markets for the evaluation of the hygienic quality of beef.
36
References
Baños Cruz, G., & Castro Rendón, R. (2013). Distribution And
Concentration Of Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms,
Escherichia Coli And Enterococci In Water And Sediment In
The Estero Salado (Sections B, D, E And G). Revista Científica
Ciencias Naturales y Ambientales. Retrieved from
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8277987
Basavaraju, M., & Gunashree, B. (2023). Escherichia coli: An
Overview of Main Characteristics. IntechOpen.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105508
Bravo, J. D., & Ramos, M. V. (October 2021). Retrieved from
https://repositorio.espam.edu.ec/bitstream/42000/1558/1/TTAI
25D.pdf
Cardozo, P. A. (2020). repository. Retrieved from repository:
https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12494/20014/4/
2020_caracterizacion_poblaciones_microbiologicas.pdf
Chiamaka Frances, E., Odira Johnson, O., Nnamdi Enoch, N.,
Chikaodili Eziamaka, A.-E., & Onyinye Ann, M. (2023).
Antibiogram of Escherichia coli Isolated from Fish (Salmon
Fish)/Meat (Beef). Asian Journal of Biomechemistry, Genetics
and Molecular Biology. doi:doi:
10.9734/ajbgmb/2023/v13i4298.
Costa, M. (2019). Retrieved from
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/10915/87511/Docum
ento_completo.pdf-PDFA.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Dier, C. A. (December 11, 2007). El Proceso De Faenamiento Y Las
Características Organolépticas De La Carne En El Ganado
Vacuno Del Camal Municipal De Ambato. Universidad Técnica
de Ambato, 97. Retrieved from
http://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/3415/3/PAL
127.pdf
FAO. (15 MARCH 2019). Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations. Retrieved from Food and Agriculture
April - June vol. 1. Num. 21 - 2024
37
Organization of the United Nations:
https://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/es/meat/home.html
Farias Luque, D. B., & Moran Bermello, O. D. (April 24, 2022).
Determination Of The Microbiological Quality Of Ground Beef
In Expendio Centers In The City Of Guayaquil. University of
Guayaquil. Retrieved from
http://repositorio.ug.edu.ec/bitstream/redug/61094/1/2022-
459%20Moran%20Bermello%20Omar%20David%20y%20Fa
rias%20Luque%20Douglas%20Byron.pdf
Hernández, W. B., Ledesma, L. M., Ángel, M. O., & Arizala, J. A. (June
2021). Scielo. Retrieved from Scielo:
https://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?pid=S1659-
13212017000200371&script=sci_abstract&tlng=es
Hidalgo, L., & Yahaira, L. (June 24, 2019). Retrieved from
http://www.dspace.uce.edu.ec/bitstream/25000/18814/1/T-
UCE-0014-MVE-055.pdf
INEN (March 17, 2016). Ecuadorian Institute of Standardization.
Retrieved from
https://www.normalizacion.gob.ec/buzon/normas/1338_3_EN
M.pdf
Kassem, I., Nasser, N., & Salibi, J. (2020). Prevalence and Loads of
Fecal Pollution Indicators and the Antibiotic Resistance
Phenotypes of Escherichia coli in Raw Minced Beef in
Lebanon. Food, 1-13. doi:10.3390/FOODS9111543.
Ministry of Public Health (JANUARY 29, 2021). Ministry of Public
Health. Retrieved from https://www.salud.gob.ec/wp-
content/uploads/2021/01/Etas-SE-03.pdf
Mohamed Ibrahim, A. F., Yusnoraini Yusof, N., & Mat-Sharani, S.
(2022). Pathogenicity Classification using Phylogenetic
Analysis of Escherichia coli Strains. Asian Journal of Medicine
and Biomedicine, 194-196. doi:https://doi.org/
10.37231/ajmb.2022.6.S1.584
MOH (September 29, 2016). Ministry of public health. Retrieved from
https://www.controlsanitario.gob.ec/wp-
content/uploads/downloads/2019/04/ARCSA-DE-067-2015-
Analysis in municipal markets for the evaluation of the hygienic quality of beef.
38
GGG_NORMATIVA-T%C3%89CNICA-SANITARIA-
PARA-ALIMENTOS-PROCESADOS.pdf
Pardo Baron, S. Y. (2020). Enfermedades Transmitidas Por Alimentos
(ETA) De Origen Microbiano Asociadas A Carne, Productos
Cárnicos Comestibles Y Derivados Cárnicos En Colombia.
Universidad Nacional Abierta Y A Distancia - UNAD.
Rodriguez, A. (October 3, 2023). Ecuador Census . Retrieved from
https://www.censoecuador.gob.ec/el-nuevo-rostro-del-guayas/
Román, D. S. (2015). Physical characteristics of natural meat in
Paraguay. Retrieved from
https://www.arp.org.py/images/files/Caracteristicas%20Fisicas
%20de%20la%20Carne%20Natural.pdf
health, O. p., & health, O. m. (DECEMBER 11, 2020). PAHO/WHO.
Retrieved from PAHO /WHO:
https://www.paho.org/es/temas/enfermedades-transmitidas-
por-alimentos
Soriano, P. S. (2018). Shelf life in fresh meats, minced meats and
preparations. eurocarne, 5. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Plinio-
Simon/publication/327883563_Vida_util_en_carnes_frescas_c
arnes_picadas_y_preparados_carnicos/links/5bab397aa6fdccd
3cb734958/Vida-util-en-carnes-frescas-carnes-picadas-y-
preparados-carnicos.pdf
Vélez Mendoza, S. I. (August 2019). Diagnóstico Del Proceso De
Faenamiento Y La Calidad Microbiólogica Carne Bovina En El
Camal Del Gad Municipal Del Cantón Bolívar. Retrieved from
https://repositorio.espam.edu.ec/bitstream/42000/1072/1/TTM
AI10.pdf
Yang, X., Tran, F., & Peipei, Z. (May 15, 2023). Comparative Genomic
Analyses of Escherichia coli from a Meat Processing
Environment in Relation to Their Biofilm Formation and
Persistence. Microbiology spectrum.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00183-23
Zotta, C. M., Lavayén, S., Nario, F., & Piquín, A. (2016). Detection of
Escherichia coli Shiga toxin-producing in viscera of animals
April - June vol. 1. Num. 21 - 2024
39
bovine and chicken intended for human consumption. Jorunal
of the Selva Andina Research Society, 7(1), 2-9.
doi:10.36610/J.JSARS.2016.070100002